Coverage remained the same at 60.227% when pulling d1dcee8 on astagi:feature/fixtypescript into 82f131f on ndelvalle:master.

I don't think a shorthand ambient module is correct way for a library to implement Typescript support. I'd prefer to see TypeScript error out when importing this module, requiring I acknowledge it is missing proper type declarations by adding the ambient module to my own .d.ts file.

@astagi this is a bit hacky, it make it looks like we have TS but we actually don't 😅

@deefour I know this, you're absolutely right! This is not the correct way to implement TS, this is just a hacky fix to support TS rapidly, avoiding errors when you import this module. @ndelvalle let me know if you want to merge this PR and release a new version with this fix or if you prefer waiting for a better TS support, in the latter case I would convert this PR to draft and start working on TS support

@astagi I prefer to have a better TS support for sure 🙂

Ok @ndelvalle this PR switches now to WIP 😉